Victor, do you have any reflections before I move to my last musing?

No, I guess I'm just a little bored over here. Well,

that's good. You could, it's the mythic egg or a dream egg, dream egg of great day. Yeah, the dream bird that hatches the egg of experience.

I'm trying to face my boredom head on.

All right, so the very last question that I have here is the question of form, the form in which it's written, which I personally found frustrating, because first of all, as we mentioned, it's only 60 pages or so, maybe 70. It's very kiffy and it almost is like, he writes every sentence almost so that it could be a quotation, like a Twitter status almost. That was my impression of it. So I found, I felt, you

should tweet the book out. Tweet

by tweet. Line by line. I found that any time that I got frustrated with a thesis or an assertion, they're never defended and you don't have time to go deeper into it. And I am the kind of person who kind of knows most of what he's talking about too, and I want it more developed. So I was wondering if you think this is an audience or a foreign academic audience, not for an academic audience. If he believes that we're overstimulated, then why is he writing a book that's more or less a list of tweets? And he's 16 books in what, like six years or something like that, I think it's actually more than that, but. They are very digested for sure. Very short books, they're made so that you don't get bored reading them. It's

a dance of a drug.

That is paradoxical.

Didn't you say it was made to be quoted?