Anthropic Versus Super Symmetry

2min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

A super symmetry naturally comes along with several higgs boson ight, right? And cause there's dynamical, mathematical mechanism that makes a prediction. Whereas in the anthropic case, you're just saying that the only reason this number is so tiny is because we wouldn't be here otherwise. A kind of ugly sort of story that i've occasionally co contemplated for hous super symmetry might end up being a little beyond what we expect.

Modern particle physics is a victim of its own success. We have extremely good theories — so good that it’s hard to know exactly how to move beyond them, since they agree with all the experiments. Yet, there are strong indications from theoretical considerations and cosmological data that we need to do better. But the leading contenders, especially supersymmetry, haven’t yet shown up in our experiments, leading some to wonder whether anthropic selection is a better answer. Michael Dine gives us an expert’s survey of the current situation, with pointers to what might come next.

Support Mindscape on Patreon.

Michael Dine received his Ph.D. in physics from Yale University. He is Distinguished Professor of Physics at the Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz. Among his awards are fellowships from the Sloan Foundation, Guggenheim Foundation, American Physical Society, and American Academy of Arts and Sciences, as well as the Sakurai Prize for theoretical particle physics. His new book is This Way to the Universe: A Theoretical Physicist’s Journey to the Edge of Reality.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.