Is There a Necessity to Actions?

The problem is, i don't see that. It seems thata dis counterfaction of creaturely freedom being causal to the action to somebody. And so it seems that nobody, a nonormalness, in my standing, at the very least, adheres to dit. Because dety is just too radical. Perhaps it may even have the potential of rendering all our past and future actions to be not source in us in the same way. I'm trumping an trumping idei aa focus on one point. One lass point to make is that the agent does cause something, but then what the agent causes, in reality, is the action, not the proposition.