The Legal Labyrinth of Election Disputes

This chapter explores the transition from equitable to stringent legal standards in election disputes, spotlighting historical instances involving Eisenhower and Kennedy. It examines the influence of judicial rulings and strict deadlines on electoral legitimacy, using case studies like Nixon vs. Kennedy to illustrate the complexities inherent in determining election outcomes. The discussion highlights the crucial role of electoral rules and judicial authority, probing into the potential conflicts that arise when legal interventions alter the election certification process.