The Washington Post's Dishonesty About the Judge's Decision

The ruling could undo years of efforts to enhance coordination between the government and social media companies. The New York Times tweeted about how this is going to undermine could curtail efforts to combat false and misleading narratives. And yet, the Washington Post just sort of brazenly implies that this will roll back progress on the cooperation leading to the capture of child sexual predators. Does it get any more dishonest than that media-wise? I can't remember anything like that.