Legal Landscape and Expert Influence

This chapter explores the implications of recent Supreme Court decisions on regulatory power, particularly focusing on the case of Loper Bright and its challenge to Chevron deference. It critiques the administrative state and emphasizes the historical role of the Federalist Society in shaping judicial appointments and strategies. The discussion further highlights the evolving relationship between experts and policy, calling for greater skepticism towards authority and a revival of congressional oversight to protect constitutional values.