Is the Object Oriented Ontology a Primary Error?

If you're thinking this way in likea object oriented ontology rigt, that's absolutely yes. Laconsqetis like your, sorry, it's already contaminated. Like the objective field is all contaminated with subjectivity. There's no way to withdraw that contamination. Your desires are already objet. They're involved in that field in a way that graham harmon, like, the main representative of that position, wouldn't avow without our contamination bit. The mis hearing becomes like, shape, totally shaping what the objective experiences. Ye, ye. It doesn't matter. I'm not going tosy. But i thought that, to me, is the great example,