The evidence generally points right like th the most plausible sceneria, i think, if you just look at it reasonably. There are windows here into which there's a non zero chance that something happened. An autopilot used optimately, is a good system, but it's got hulls. And these people literally, i think, went right through em. The argument then becomes, i think, rom for the tess of defenders and musk im becomes, why did they do this? Like, we tell them not to do this. We tell them not to doing this, and,. and, and, and, that’s why. But again, even if you accept
The internet is in an uproar about the latest fatal Tesla crash, in which two men were found burned alive with nobody in the driver's seat. Though the investigation has only just begun, the evidence available suggests a troubling new twist on past Autopilot crashes. As the gang sorts through the available facts, they attempt to answer the bizarre question at the heart of this case: what would make someone operate a driver assistance system as if it were fully driverless?