The Abundance of Evidence Is Not Evidence of Abuse

There is not one piece of evidence that you can consider to be unmistakable, undeniable, incontrovertible. I am pretty sure that emperor vicramaditia was a real person. He really existed. When i say that the mahabart actually happened, it's because we have evidence that hiv actually happened. Events that are described in the mahbarth are now known to be true. And all thatt is still a work in progress, but we are reasonably sure that the raman also has historical basis. Some people say that his empire was all over asia. Ok, you beg the claim, but can you please substantiate that claim with some actual evidence?