Exploring the problematic practices in arson investigations, the chapter recounts specific cases where faulty methodologies led to wrongful accusations and convictions. It sheds light on the controversial tactics of investigators like Vasquez, who assumed arson from the start and used questionable evidence to support their conclusions. A poignant example is highlighted where a man was wrongly convicted and sentenced to death for a fire that was misinterpreted due to flawed investigation techniques.
Arson investigation has changed a lot over the years. There is actual science available now, but the word still hasn't totally gotten out. Listen in today, and don't play with matches!
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.