Study looked at how people categorize different types of entities. People were asked to place animals and nature closer to their inner circle of moral concern compared to the out group members, or vice versa. The researchers found a reversal in these two marginal groups - with humans more likely to be tree huggers than non-hierarchists.
Transcript
chevron_right
Play full episode
chevron_right
Transcript
Episode notes
I was raised in the tradition of believing that everyone is of equal moral worth. But when I scrutinise my daily practices, I don’t think I can honestly say that I act as if everyone is of equal moral worth. The idea that some people belong within the circle of moral concern and some do not is central to many moral systems. But what affects the dynamics of the moral circle? How does it contract and expand? Can it expand indefinitely? In this episode I discuss these questions with Joshua Rottman. Josh is an associate Professor in the Department of Psychology and the Program in Scientific and Philosophical Studies of Mind at Franklin and Marshall College. His research is situated at the intersection of cognitive development and moral psychology, and he primarily focuses on studying the factors that lead certain entities and objects to be attributed with (or stripped of) moral concern.
