He thinks it's incoherent what theyare suggesting that we can just step outside our perspective and make judgments. We don't realize that the very concepts that we are using to make those judgments are part of our immediate they're built into our immediate experience. The apparent world is the world, right? There's nothing else. L i think he would reject a kind of realism that science is going to give us the true reality.
Socrates was ugly and tired of life, so he made a tyrant of reason. Philosophers are mummies who hate the body and the senses. Reason is a tricky old woman. Morality is a misunderstanding. Kant is a sneaky Christian. And don't even get Nietzsche started on "free will" or the "self" - just excuse for priests to punish people, a hangman's metaphysics. David and Tamler dive into Friedrich Nietzsche's Twilight of the Idols, a fascinating set of aphorisms brimming with passion, provocation, questions without answers.
Plus, a professor is sanctioned for sex talk with his students - fair or coddling foul?
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: