AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Judicial Restraint vs. Personal Belief
This chapter examines the delicate balance between judicial responsibilities and legislative policymaking, particularly in the context of net neutrality cases. Judges share their experiences with maintaining impartiality and the potential conflicts that arise when personal beliefs intersect with legal standards. The discussion emphasizes the importance of judicial restraint and the implications of allowing personal views to influence court rulings.