Lawfare Archive: Sue Biniaz on the Trump Administration and International Climate Policy
The Lawfare Podcast
00:00
Non Legally Binding?
If you don't meet your nationally determined contribution, you're not in violation of the agreement. And why was that corps obligation? Why was that made legally non binding? Ye, well, i shouldn't give the omnpession that all parties wanted it to be non legally binding. The us also did not want to take on illegally binding commitment for itself. It also wanted china ani a, wanted the major mitters in from the developing country. So it favored a non binding target also to have a inclusive agreement for its own part.
Play episode from 46:27
Transcript
