The Role of Tears in Character

4min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

Seneca asks: What would it say of our character if we felt for a time? Great sadness. Would the sage simply say, oh, but soup is nothing but a calming pleasure to a sick man and it will not change the end result, so why even bother? That sounds quite nihilistic to me, Seneca. If y is the guaranteed outcome, and x will do nothing to change that outcome, but x will make the journey to y more pleasant, what does foregoing x completely say about our character? And is that of the sage? Is that of good character? Is thatof virtue? I would say almost certainly not.

I just think he's wrong, partially, on emotions.

#1: Become a premium subscriber and get rid of ads: https://practicalstoicism.supportingcast.fm

#2: Visit our store but buy some stuff: https://shop.stoicismpod.com

#3: Attend some of our live workshops (or watch the replays): https://actualstoicism.com

#4: Subscribe to our free Substack: https://stoicismpod.substack.com

#5: Join our free Discord community: https://stoicismpod.com/discord

#6: Join our Stoic Journaling Program: https://link.stoicismpod.com/journaling

Online copy of Meditations (Long) : https://link.stoicismpod.com/meditations-long

Online copy of Meditations (Casaubon) : https://link.stoicismpod.com/meditations-casaubon

Online copy of Meditations (Farquharson) : https://link.stoicismpod.com/farquharson

Online copy of Seneca's Letters : https://link.stoicismpod.com/letters

Sponsor InsideTracker : https://insidetracker.com/stoicism