The Moral Consequences of Difference

There's this whole conspiracy against difference to try to render it identical. And there's a kind of moral overtone that gets itself forgotten and almost normalized, which is why I think he thinks of the dogmatic image of thought as orthodox and moral. There's something about how the fight against this moral image of thought always wants to bury differences or not find a true concept for them. It also related to these other forms of transcendence that you sort of became big, the end you've talked with that with the constant transcendental illusions.