Evolving Interpretations of the Eighth Amendment

This chapter explores the historical development of the Eighth Amendment, focusing on key court cases that address cruel and unusual punishment. It discusses the Supreme Court's reactions to harsh punitive measures, particularly in the context of U.S. governance over the Philippines, and highlights the ongoing evolution of legal interpretations influenced by societal standards. The narrative emphasizes the importance of adapting constitutional principles to reflect contemporary norms, revealing how cases like Trope v. Dulles shape our understanding of rights, including citizenship.