Exploring the Historical Context of the Number of Jurors

The chapter dives into the historical significance of the number of jurors required for a trial, from the traditional 12 to cases where the Supreme Court allowed trials with only six jurors. Justice Gorsuch's dissenting opinion on the reliability of social science evidence supporting six jurors and the Court's reluctance to address the issue are examined. The conversation also touches on Justice Kagan's dissent in the Ramos case, debates on constitutionally required characteristics of jurors, and a significant case of racial gerrymandering in South Carolina.