i don't have an argument against most of what peter singer recommends when he says that, you know, all of us are malignantly selfish in how we spend our time and resources. But still, ii just want et hot sut sua t universe where you thrive and 60 % of the world doesn't thrive,. versus you thrive a little less and 56% of the universe thrive. The extreme cases are a little too easy. I mean, those are the tough cases, cause that's the case of our lives right now, righte. We're thriving now, but we would thrive a littleLess if we made the world a little better. Why should we do that?