Is the State Doing Something That Violates My Faith?

Judge with two ds stone. He made clear that he thought the mere proximity to thexct date conclusively proved that the prisoner's religious beliefs were, in fact, not sincere but animated by a desire to delay the possible execution. The state itself, and actually also eric fagin, who is a deputy solicitor general, who is arguing for the federal government in this case, is amachus. They all seem to be suggesting that it is completely fine to question the sincerity of a religious belief when someone comes to court and says, the state is doing something that violates my religious beliefs or faith. And i couldn't quite believe what i was hearing, right? Like, i just