Are You Treating Likes Unlikes Unalike?

If you argue with a slave, it could be coherent if the slave was justly enslaved. But i would say it's irrelevant difference if i'm enslaving you because you committed aggression and i didn't commit aggressor meat. This is what i argue in detail of my stople theory of rights, a, which you can find on my web side. If mere difference means you own the other person, then that doesn't solve conflict. It's not a type of rule grounded in the nature of things. You can't have arbitrary distinctions. They have to be grounded in thenature of things ad they have to be relevant andrelevant to the topic under discussion.

Play episode from 42:13

Transcript

The AI-powered Podcast Player

Save insights by tapping your headphones, chat with episodes, discover the best highlights - and more!

Get the app