Is There a Difference in Philosophy Between Aquinas and Voiti?

My understanding is that Voiti were sought to look at our experiences of being male and female through a phenomenological lens. And maybe show how that isn't incongruent with to mystic teleology. Does that make sense? So look at your experience not as if this is something subjective, wholly independent of teleology but the two somehow are mutually supportive. Yeah. Both Voiti were in Stein recognized that this ceiling off of contemporary philosophy phenomenology from the medieval philosophy scholasticism was problematic because it's not like our ancestors didn't see the world and think clearly about the world.