i'm trying to offer the idea of synoptic integration and genuine pluralism as an alternative, both to neclective relativism and some sort of monolithic monism. The mixed martial artists kick the asses ofof the purists regularly and reliably. So let's pay attention to that and stop pretending. And stop pretending. I think what whent i'm trying to argue is we are always committed to the best scientific account of the functionality that is needed. We do not get to choose the functionality,. That's a very strong series set of constraints. It's very much what i argue about. Yes very much.
John Vervaeke answers questions live. This is the first in a series of live Q&As with Future Thinkers podcast guests.
Participation in the discussion is exclusive to Future Thinkers Premium Members. If you want to become a Member, go to http://members.futurethinkers.org/ and get access to our in-depth courses in personal evolution, private group calls, podcast extras, Q&A's with prominent thinkers, and more.
Check out our Watch Parties and Discussions of John Vervaeke's Awakening from the Meaning Crisis lecture series on YouTube.
Future Thinkers previous interview with John Vervaeke: http://www.futurethinkers.org/98
Enter our contest at http://www.futurethinkers.org/giveaway and win 6 months worth of Premium Membership, as well as 1 month supply of Qualia Nootropic Energy from Neurohacker Collective.