The Concern Around Research Publication Makes a Lot of Sinnery

2min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

We can buy our own genetic a kits, diana a writers and so forth. You mentioned that it would be sensible to at least imagine restrictions on either the technology or the publication of the technology. I never know what countries are doing in secret, but i think that your the motivations that you mention do make a lot of sense. For the terrorist group, just for the mad scientist, or whatever.

We’re pretty well-calibrated when it comes to dealing with common, everyday-level setbacks. But our brains aren’t naturally equipped for dealing with unlikely but world-catastrophic disasters. Yet such threats are real, both natural and human-induced. We need to collectively get better at anticipating and preparing for them, at the level of political action. Andrew Leigh is an academic and author who now serves in the Parliament of Australia. We discuss how to move the conversation about existential risks from the ivory tower to implementation in real policies.

Support Mindscape on Patreon.

Andrew Leigh received his Ph.D. in Public Policy from the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. He is a member of the Australian House of Representatives representing Fenner. He was previously a professor of economics at Australian National University, and has served as Shadow Assistant Minister for Treasury and Charities. His recent book is What’s the Worst That Could Happen? Existential Risk and Extreme Politics.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.