The Truth Maker Theory on Molanism

The truth maker is the state of affairs of, for example, take the c c f. If a non existent person s, so take that this. We have a person s, and person does not exist, right? And will not exist. So if that counterfactual is true, 's actions are the truth maker for the truth of c. But i'm alcated with the truth maker theory being applied to molanism. With that amended dependent thesis then, no, i don't agree. I just simply agree with that a truth maker theory needs to be applied to counterfact s of creaturely freedom but, but not with that amanded thesis.