What Do You Like or Hate About Your Art?

2min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

melike, i feel like i have to start between splitting the comedy off from everything else. For for me, what i would say is, i like what some people love. Richard wagner, ike, those are the kinds of things that pull me in. There's no piece of bock, no oratorioa i couldn't profitably spend a month onSome mean, th like for me, iket, like it,. especially whenanything were's produced by someone who feels like what thereis doing is fantastic.

"No single paper is that good", says Bryan Caplan. To really understand a topic, you need to read the entire literature in the field. And to do the kind of scholarship Bryan's work requires, you need to cover multiple fields. Only that way can you assemble a wide variety of evidence into useful knowledge.

But few scholars ever even try to reach the enlightened interdisciplinary plane. So how does he do it?

Tyler explores Bryan's approach, including how to avoid the autodidact's curse, why his favorite philosopher happens to be a former classmate, what Tolstoy has that science fiction lacks, the idea trap, most useful wrong beliefs, effective altruism, Larry David, what most economics papers miss about the return to education, and more.

Read a full transcript enhanced with helpful links.

Recorded April 17th, 2018 Other ways to connect

Follow us on Twitter and Instagram
Follow Tyler on Twitter
Follow Bryan on Twitter
Email us: cowenconvos@mercatus.gmu.edu
Subscribe at our newsletter page to have the latest Conversations with Tyler news sent straight to your inbox.