Machine Learning

It's 93% accurate you don't know which the 7% are and you can't really tell how it's still getting there. So that 7% wrong and correct that yeah. And I think the kind of the interesting thing here is if you apply this to you do the same thing in images and you ask for something that you would have text in it. It's got stuff that looks like text but isn't text. Oh no. Yeah. But leaveable enough that you look at it and go yeah that seems correct but actually the source doesn't exist.