Paul's Language About God

Wesley Hill argues that if we assume the later doctrinal expressions of the Trinity, we can fruitfully read and understand the New Testament in light of them. And I think he's got some, a very good point to make, and I love how he deals with subordinationist language in the book. But it's not for me, who's primarily a historical critical reader of the New Testament. It's lacking in a robust enough engagement with the conceptuality and network of ideas inherent in Paul. In fact, I think that's the common denominator in many ways to all of these views.