Debating Fluoride and Health Responsibilities

This chapter initiates a debate on who bears the burden of proof regarding claims about fluoride's impact on children's neuropsychiatric health, emphasizing the responsibilities of claim-makers versus skeptics. The discussion explores varying ideological perspectives on evidence and justification, highlighting a divide between right-wing and left-wing thinkers. It also critiques the demand for certainty in scientific claims, reflects on water fluoridation practices, and debates the health implications of fluoridated and distilled water.