Do the latin american left governments that have contended for contended for power and governed since the ots still maintain, perhaps, drawing on dependency theory? Have they basically picked up where dependency theorists left off in terms of their emphasis on global inequality. And are they using similar instruments, or the instruments look the same, but are actually kind of very different. I don't think i have a concrete answer to this question, but i do think it's there. There are certain initiatives that sat were put for word vi cepalinos in sort of the development era, that come only to be realized to more to a larger and more fuller extent in the neo liberal era.
Historian Margarita Fajardo on her book The World That Latin America Created: The United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America in the Development Era. Fajardo discusses the Latin American economists at the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (CEPAL) who conceptualized the division of the global economy between center and periphery, and how that later gave rise to dependency theory and world systems theory. Plus Cuban Revolution and the Alliance for Progress, Allende's democratic road to socialism and right-wing coups in Chile and Brazil—and more.
Support The Dig at Patreon.com/TheDig