Azero, I'm Afraid at This Point, It'll Be Two Years.

Kant's claim is that hume didn't draw these distinctions finely enough, and that's the reason why he got confused. So analytic a priori propositions are going to be basically things that fall with the law of contradiction. And then we have analytic apostory propositions, which pretty much are going to remain blank. Wright: i can't imagine what would be an analytic a posteriory proposition. Nothing. Right?