In practice, it does quite matter. Some intense systems like Cal swap or RFQs just have a very particular notion of efficiency. So I guess my question is, you know, you're talking about a definition that doesn't include it. What's like the boundary? It feels like it's like a computational complexity boundary in which some things can be intense, but never verifiably efficient intense.
This week, host Anna Rose and co-host Tarun Chitra catch up with Chris Goes from Heliax, the team behind Anoma and Namada. They start with a quick retrospective about IBC, a project he formerly worked on, and how the protocol has evolved since it launched.
They dive into the concept of 'intents', exploring their origin, evolution, and discuss the intent-based systems that exist today. As well, they chat about the architectures enabled by a generalized intent-based infrastructure, the potential impacts on user experience, and the inherent trade-offs, particularly when zero-knowledge or privacy aspects are added to the mix.
Further reading for this episode:
Papers/Docs
Websites
Talks/YouTube
Podcast Eps
zkSummit 10 is happening in London on September 20, 2023! Apply to attend now -> zkSummit 10 Application Form
Polygon 2.0 and all of our ZK tech is open-source and community-driven. Reach out to the Polygon community on Discord to learn more, contribute, or join in and build the future of Web3 together with Polygon!
Aleo is a new Layer-1 blockchain that achieves the programmability of Ethereum, the privacy of Zcash, and the scalability of a rollup.
For questions, join their Discord at aleo.org/discord.
If you like what we do: