The Problem With Universal Skepticism

I feel like it's just basically become another way of rephrasing that we all have like certain preferences in life. We might have a really strong inclination towards identity or non-contradiction, much to the extent that we probably have really strong inclined towards things like murder or torture. But it doesn't necessarily mean that the moral fact is there. What it might mean is that if there is such thing as truth or I should say accessible truth, because really this is an epistemological problem rather than an ontological one by which they're talking about how we might come to know moral truths.