I don't think you start this company unless you care about people being able to express themselves as much as possible. But I think what people agree on pretty broadly is that it does make sense from a societal perspective to tolerate less, less speech that could be potentially harmful in an acute situation. The challenge with free speech is that everyone agrees that there is a line where if you're actually about to do physical harm to people, that there should be restrictions. If you'd kind of asked, now, a priori, would a global pandemic where, you know, a lot of people are dying and catching this, is that an emergency where you'd consider it problematic to basically yell fire in