The Code of Canon Law Is Not Constructed to Answer This Question

The current edition of the code of canon law is not configured to answer this question for us. And so as a result, the answer is debatable. One argument would be that when clear leaves the 19 rties and goes back to am to the eighteenth century, i think it said, eighteenth century scotland. So she goes back to the 17 hundreds, and her husband is no longer alive from her frame of reference,. Because he's not alive in the 17 hundred, so in terms of her experience, he's no longer alive. That can mean that she's no longer married to him, in which case she ou be free to marry jamie a the and it would be