Is It a Bad Thing to Admit?

I think unless is a point that i keep trying to make with my research, human nature is all shades of gray. With ot those foibles, there would be no history. Am i refuting any of the evidence that's been presented? No, i'm not. But you can interpret history differently. I could have been written even after the conversations. A could arang tat and i, you know, vep mennon was some we have to remember, this was 19 forty seven, red. Backchannel talks take place all the time in diplomacy and tics. Back genral talks are very rarely documented neatly. Is the only way in which we can actually constructively reconstruct