Why Did the Planes Hit the Buildings and Explosive Devices Be Used?

2min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

conspiracy theories are often proxies for some other belief, a deeper belief. So if i take you to the comet ping pong petsare an washington, d c, and show you that they don't have a basement, much less a petifile ring run by hilary where they're eating babies, it's not like you're going to go, oh, in that case, i'll vote for hilary or y i think i'll be a democrat. We can debunk this through logic. You know, we publish all this stuff in sceptic but, you know, people don't care about the details. It's like, i don't like republicans, or

In this wide-ranging conversation Shermer and Nisbett discuss Nisbett’s research showing how people reason, how people should reason, why errors in reasoning occur, how much you can improve reasoning, what kinds of problems are best solved by the conscious mind and what kinds by the unconscious mind, and how we should think about intelligence, along with the controversies over group differences and genetic influences on I.Q. scores and why Charles Murray (The Bell Curve) is wrong in inferring genetic causes for group differences in I.Q.. Nisbett also shows that self-knowledge can be dramatically off-kilter and points to ways to improve it, and demonstrates how different cultures have radically different ways of reasoning and feeling, and how this led to his most famous research showing the difference between Northerners and Southerners in rates of violence, the culture of honor, and a hair-trigger for slights and insults. The two also discuss the #metoo, BLM, antiracism, and woke movements today in context of his psychological research.