Supreme Court Debates on Gender-Affirming Care for Minors

This chapter examines the Supreme Court's oral arguments regarding a Tennessee law that restricts gender-affirming care for minors, with broader implications across the U.S. It analyzes complex legal arguments about discrimination, parental rights, and the potential re-evaluation of state regulations in light of federal challenges. The discussion incorporates historical context, audio excerpts from the oral arguments, and the intersection of medical needs with evolving political ideologies.