AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Plan Parenthood v Ranquist
In planned parenthood v both ranquist and scalia file one, their basic premise is the same. They think that states can essentially regulate abortion as they deem fit - which would be either the functional or the literal end of rove wade. Scalia also says that the regulation of abortion is one of the long standing traditions of american society, which is absolute. But you know, i'm going to keep beating this drum because it's so important understanding the jurisprudence of someone like scalia. He is portraying a fake version of history. The reactionary ogenda is about stifling social progress. And in order to do that, they need to hearken to and