This is a three hour podcast, and maybe like five minutes talking about this, like, clipper, whatever. Showing the clip, a totally fair. It seems super, super obvious vers right? And they have the precedented case from before, four or five years ago, and they're getting sued now because they use this. They're claiming that, since the podcast has a million views, that all of those views would have been paper viewthats views, which is like 50 bucks. This just feels like something that, again, is potentially attacking, it's not just attacking them. I think there's probably a rule around it where they're like, you can show the

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode