There has to some way to test it, or else you're just asserting things without evidence. The key there is to be able to say in advance what would count, right? And then you get into b whats what constitutes quality evidence in support of your particular hypothesis? That's where it gets trickier but at that point, i think you are talking about a evidence. I mean, that the dragon thing reminds me of my conversations with flat earthers, right? Every time you say something, then it's, oh, no, no, that wouldn't count. What about the moon landing? No, that didn't happen. How do you know there's a dome? Well
“Climate change is a hoax — and so is coronavirus.” “Vaccines are bad for you.” These days, many of our fellow citizens reject scientific expertise and prefer ideology to facts. They are not merely uninformed — they are misinformed. They cite cherry-picked evidence, rely on fake experts, and believe conspiracy theories. How can we convince such people otherwise? How can we get them to change their minds and accept the facts when they don’t believe in facts? In this conversation based on his new book, Lee McIntyre shows that anyone can fight back against science deniers, and argues that it’s important to do so.