I think people should just read the paper themselves. There's a lot of vulgarities in there. We siethoege published thatactioal peniss do exist. So so that the conceptual penis was just the forerunner for the thousand pound hammer, which was so call squared. And that was the targeting of the best journals, absurd, morally reprehensible conclusions. A lot of these didn't intraction because they're too esoteric. I can tell you about some of them if you want. The larger point is that we pointed out that there are problems in this body of literature. Those problems are influencing public policies and university policies, which are then reinforcing themselves. Things are bleeding out

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode