It is true that people assign mail at birth do develop breast cance

aha, and uter in cancer? I don't think so. Ye, no, ned, a uteris for then

continuing the quote as representative snow noted dryly at the congressional hearings. Somehow i find it hard believe that the male dominated medical community would tolerate a study of prostate cancer that used only women as research subjects. And malquotes.

I

can't that one just echoed in my head for days h nearly anywhere they looked, there was a striking lack of inclusion of women, and enormous consequences because of that. Biological differences between people assigned male at birth and people assigned female at birth have orically been used to claim inferiority or superiority, while failing to examine the potential health impact of that difference, such as in the way drugs are metabolized, which is impacted by fat distribution and hormones, among other factors. So when women aren't included in drug les, should we be surprised by the finding that women arequte, 50 to 75 % more likely than men to have an adverse drug reaction? Ike, that's not a surprising finding.

It's horrible. Well, and i also just wonder how many of those adverse drug reactions are often just passed off as being, oh, well, like not real, you know, aha, discounted. I'm sure many are.