Is the New York Times Really a Science Podcast?

The article is so shallow and vapid and like I said misandrist. It makes me feel dirty to have to say that because it sounds like a line out of some men's rights activists Yeah, you're not a man's which is which is not my stance. The New York Times style section? Can be described as vapid and shallow and misandrist or are they simply just sinking to the level of my expectations continually?Yeah, I don't know I mean I do know yes So it ends with another quote from this guy Pang who does a science podcastYou think a science podcast will be More close closer to what we do here on the local maximum he was quoted as