TV was homogenous and monolithic, at least controlled by some small group of people so that everybody was watching the same stuff. Irony comes along, sort of dominates, makes us feel better. And that irony, I think, DFW wants to say that started eating at the core of the American psyche. So whether or not watching too much deadwood is like a waste of life, I think it would be a very different waste of life than what he's trying to say.
We dive into David Foster Wallace’s sprawling 1993 essay “E Unibus Pluram: Television and U.S. Fiction.” How do TV and new forms of media keep their hold on us when we know at some level that they’re reinforcing our loneliness and passivity? That’s easy, Wallace says, post-modern cool. Flatter me, let me think we’re all in the joke together, give me “an ironic permission-slip to do what I do best whenever I feel confused and guilty: assume, inside, a sort of fetal position, a pose of passive reception to comfort, escape, reassurance.” But in the years since this essay, the TV landscape has completely transformed. Has it transcended its function as a surrogate companion for lonely people, or has it just found new ways to keep us isolated and passive?
Plus, we talk about the recent new SPSP guidelines and Jon Haidt’s recent essay on why he’s resigning from the organization. (Sorry, Jon!)
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: