The taliban is included in facebook's list of dangerous organizations, which means any content promoting or representing them should be banned. Couldn't we also use what's at and facebook, even if it is en to an inscription, to spy on the taliman? If one person was identified, you would probably know the medadata, who's talking to who. And mit facebook, if approached by the c e, i a and they said, "We would like you to create this bogus version of what's at" It could very well be that zucke berg would make the pragmatic decision Zuckuk is facing - he wants to curry favor with his father-in-law
Podcasting from Italy after a 2-week break of news, Jason covers Casey Newton's failed dunk on Superhuman's $75M raise (2:58), the privacy implications of Apple's approach to preventing child porn distribution (23:14), the Helium Networks internet project (35:02), crypto regulation (43:03), and how WhatsApp is handling Afghanistan (49:45).