In your moral theory the humans being better than the aliens, it's kind of a toss up. And this notion that you can't actually escape some pre existing degree of partiality in the normative framework seems to re surface. I think it would e a mistake to favour the humans by like ten thousand to one. Supposing you could do some very risky thing that could like, wipe out both, 50 50 chance of wiping out both aliens and humans, but 50 % chance of saving the humans? Then i'm like, no, don't do that thing. Would i give some extra weight to human originating civilization? All things considered,. now you're superinfluential. Does that mean
When Tyler is reviewing grants for Emergent Ventures, he is struck by how the ideas of effective altruism have so clearly influenced many of the smartest applicants, particularly the younger ones. And William MacAskill, whom Tyler considers one of the world’s most influential philosophers, is a leading light of the community.
William joined Tyler to discuss why the movement has gained so much traction and more, including his favorite inefficient charity, what form of utilitarianism should apply to the care of animals, the limits of expected value, whether effective altruists should be anti-abortion, whether he would side with aliens over humans, whether he should give up having kids, why donating to a university isn’t so bad, whether we are living in “hingey” times, why buildering is overrated, the sociology of the effective altruism movement, why cultural innovation matters, and whether starting a new university might be next on his slate.
Read a full transcript enhanced with helpful links, or watch the full video.
Recorded July 7th, 2022 Other ways to connect