The Second Shot Could Not Have Been Fired by Harry

There's a debate on the velocity of the bullet, and then there's also information about the powder marks. So which one do you prefer to hear first? Well, first, I know you gave me a very general statement as to he was struck three times. But could you be more specific about where he is struck with the bullets? Okay, so the positioning of the gun it is. Let's talk about that. Here's a doctor who gets on the stand for the state. He tells the court that he believes the second bullet could not have been fired by Harry. Because the first bullet which penetrated the bone near the right ear remained in the bone, but it had produced instant unconscious