In this first episode of Uneasy Money, hosts Luca Netz, Kain Warwick, and Taylor Monahan dig into the Balancer hack, Berachain’s centralized response, the sudden return of ICO-style distribution, and why some new drops give away so little.
Luca explains why he thinks generous airdrops are essential for building a real “army,” Taylor breaks down MetaMask’s own thinking on token incentives, and Kain questions whether any of these models still make sense in a sentiment-driven market.
Plus, Uniswap’s fee switch proposal and the tea on Velodrome and Aerodrome.
Hosts:
Timestamps:
-
👏 0:00 Intro
-
🛑 1:23 The Balancer hack—and why we need more guardrails beyond audits
-
🐻 10:18 How Berachain’s centralized response raised deeper questions
-
🚀 19:19 The return of the ICO meta
-
💰 21:26 Why Luca says big airdrops are essential to building an “army”
-
🐧 24:24 How Luca designed the PENGU airdrop—including the goal of surpassing DOGE
-
📉 37:11 What’s the point of airdrops if everyone just dumps?
-
⚖️ 39:50 Are ICOs actually better than airdrops?
-
🦊 43:41 How MetaMask designed its rewards system—and what Taylor thinks about incentives
-
🦄 47:19 Uniswap’s UNIFICATION proposal and what it showed about what drives prices
-
🔀 49:42 Velodrome + Aerodrome merge—and why Kain says the move is “weird”
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
