Is There a Consensus Within a Particular Epistemic Community?

I don't think it's possible for everybody to be wrong about something even things like that, which is not the same thing as saying it's objective. And if everyone agrees on that story, then that story is true. There's not kind of like an authority above the level of social consensus about that. I actually think we just have more more ways of accessing the world than than a language, for example,. But this idea of consensus within a particular epistemic community, I think is is not right.